Dear Jamileh,
I certainly hope not. Betrayal is worse than bitter honesty and Ephia's Well has been doing too much betrayal.
I am not the deciding factor, I am an advisor, thus I am advising that it is ill-advised to create inroads with a city state, when all it takes is another election and the next administration to turn hostile against the city state we have made inroads with. With anti-Gohari rhetoric at a extreme, it is a concern that we should prepare for, should the election take a turn for the worst, sooner or later. In this way, we do not whimsically turn upon those whom we have made promises with. We maintain relationships that are professional and at arm's length.
It has been a year. Tlonsiyya is due. They have come to collect the bill, just as the Legates mean to begin work on the district. You can see the conflict of interest. Thus, the necessity of attempting to find some middle-ground: upholding our promises, while keeping our honor in tact, and fulfilling our political agendas at the same time.
Provided we do not manage this agreement with Tlonsiyya, we have two matters of recourse:
1) Allow deeper Gohari investment. It is said that they are likely to pay much more for its construction, if they are involved in the process.
2) Delay construction until after Tlonsiyya is paid and the workers have returned.
The decision I leave to the Legates and their chosen delegation.
The "problem" as it were, was created after Samantha Ashbury's concerns over costs. She has the quotes of labor costs and is currently the Scribe overlooking the accounts for the district. If she did not think it was worth the worry, I would not feel the worry, either.
You can leave further inquiry at the Palatial Pyramid.
Scribe Amani al-Ibrahim.
I certainly hope not. Betrayal is worse than bitter honesty and Ephia's Well has been doing too much betrayal.
I am not the deciding factor, I am an advisor, thus I am advising that it is ill-advised to create inroads with a city state, when all it takes is another election and the next administration to turn hostile against the city state we have made inroads with. With anti-Gohari rhetoric at a extreme, it is a concern that we should prepare for, should the election take a turn for the worst, sooner or later. In this way, we do not whimsically turn upon those whom we have made promises with. We maintain relationships that are professional and at arm's length.
It has been a year. Tlonsiyya is due. They have come to collect the bill, just as the Legates mean to begin work on the district. You can see the conflict of interest. Thus, the necessity of attempting to find some middle-ground: upholding our promises, while keeping our honor in tact, and fulfilling our political agendas at the same time.
Provided we do not manage this agreement with Tlonsiyya, we have two matters of recourse:
1) Allow deeper Gohari investment. It is said that they are likely to pay much more for its construction, if they are involved in the process.
2) Delay construction until after Tlonsiyya is paid and the workers have returned.
The decision I leave to the Legates and their chosen delegation.
The "problem" as it were, was created after Samantha Ashbury's concerns over costs. She has the quotes of labor costs and is currently the Scribe overlooking the accounts for the district. If she did not think it was worth the worry, I would not feel the worry, either.
You can leave further inquiry at the Palatial Pyramid.
Scribe Amani al-Ibrahim.