Reflection on past failures
This last segment of the paper will examine previous failures and problems encountered during the course of mercenary work. The purpose is to outline a small number of failures clearly and concisely. Following the explanation of each failure, solutions are presented.
"I have worked with some people on jobs who just have a well trained and almost flawless understanding of where they need to be, when they should pull back to a more advantageous position with cover, et cetera.."
- Leiah Avryana, scholar
Exposed to archers
Many a time, the writer has been party to a group whose shieldbearer takes the fight to the enemy and disregards their often formidable backline of slingers or worse. In such situations, the entire unit is exposed to the assault from the front and also pelted by stones or arrows. In the worst case, the enemy missiles find purchase in the vulnerable backline who are unable to perform their role adequately or at all.
The solution involves using walls and natural formations in order to block enemy archers from firing at the unit. If enemy fire is inevitable, it is crucial to be ready to employ vials of blurring.
Ignoring choke points, caught in the open
A similar mistake in tactics involves the unit's inability to recognize potential choke points. Otherwise, the unit might recognize the ideal position but be unable to reach it in time before the enemy swarms the formation. The result has been either a drawn-out battle on many fronts or the quick slaughtering of the unit.
Solution involves noting defensive formations and choke points beforehand, and making sure to utilize them to the fullest in combat. Sometimes it is necessary to fall back to a defensible position and then the leader should be clear to call for an organized retreat.
Ineffective use of a choke point
Often small units hold choke points such as doors or narrow tunnels that are so small that two combatants struggle to stand beside one another. Therefore, it is often the case that only one or two combatants are swinging at the enemy while the rest of the frontline stands idly.
The solution involves arranging the frontline in a concave formation that lures the enemy past the choke point in hopes of breaching through. Instead, they are cut by the combined might of the entire frontline. In addition, versatile combatants often carry a bow or a similar option with which they may engage at range when the front is too crowded. Brief intermissions in battle are also suitable for the use of disruptive devices, especially if the group is exposed to enemy archers or slingers. Otherwise, bombs are a sound option.
Conflicting orders
Many problems arise from the unit having different tactical solutions to threats that arise in combat. For instance, one combatant might call for a retreat while another presses for a charge. When the unit splits its attention and potential between two maneuvers, even brilliant stratagems fall apart and the group is exposed to the enemy.
The solution involves choosing a leader whose word takes precedence during the engagement.
Unattended enemy magus
Left to their own devices, enemy magi will often rain destructive and debilitating invocations on the unit. Therefore, recognizing and neutralizing the threat is of primary concern. There have been many times when groups have been unable to properly address the threat, which leads to the enemy magus dispelling their wards or perhaps blasting the group on their knees with a powerful gust of wind before raining acid and fire on them.
The solution involves having access to vials of insulation and blurring, and agreeing the manner in which the enemy magus is to be dealt with. Usually the safest way is to use the terrain to the group's advantage, thereby forcing the mage out in the open where they may be singled out by the archer. If that is not possible, whittling down the enemy numbers from a safe position before risking a charge is the second safest option. Skilled groups with confidence in their survivability may even choose to charge magi outright, though such strategy is always best negotiated in advance.
Atreus Loukanis has a warning for armsmen:
"When holding the battle lines, consider what is the true threat to your company. A shaman invoking endless stream of conjurations will demand a break in formation, but too often I have seen men break line to chase a mere evoker slinging cantrips."
Blinded by avarice, slow to advance
The most frustrating way for a group to squander any profit that might be had is by busying themselves with looting and treasure when there is still fighting to be had. Wards fade, and it is best to press on while time is of the essence. Many a time has a group run out of protective magic simply because it has been too slow to advance, and often rampant looting is the cause.
The solution involves marking sites of potential finds and coming back to them once the enemy has been silenced. The rest is a balance of caution and steady advance. Some groups may prefer to save wards for later and in that situation early avarice and slow advance are not problems of similar magnitude.
"I had accompanied a band of sluggish shield bearers flanked by a pair of wizards. Their approach was slow and steady, lacking much brute force.. But so heavily enspelled that the foe could do little harm to them. Like dragging their feet through quicksand, slowly, slowly they battled until their magicks ran out. And suddenly, the foe became overbearing."
- Atreus Loukanis
Snorri further recommends that the person gathering the spoils should be skilled and known to be of sound moral character.
Split formation, force divided
The unit should always stick together unless splitting up is part of a maneuver upon which the group has agreed in advance. Sometimes a group neglects the importance of sticking together, and broken formations caused by poorly communicated charges and retreats expose the unit to undue danger.
"Sometimes there comes a time for a charge. It is important that all fall in step, a force split is beset on too many sides, and twice as weakened -- those behind may be slain or wounded, or worse."
- Gustav Tattori
The solution involves loud, clear and concise communication when it comes to orchestrating maneuvers. Tactics like charging enemy magi should be agreed upon before attempting to use them. When maneuvers are called for, the call ideally comes from the leader. It is crucial to maintain unit coherence unless tactics demand otherwise. Some situations such as hostile large scale evocations or the presence traps may require a split formation.
Death by a thousand cuts
Many a time has a group been besieged by seemingly nonthreatening foes like goblin runts and slinger, only to find that their combined blows wear down even a mighty warrior. Enemy missiles, even sling projectiles, may have a similar effect. The enemy may also employ offensive cantrips and first circle magic.
The solution involves employing vials of blur and being mindful of the group's positioning so that the group does not get swarmed.
Excessive reliance on the mender
One such situation involved a frontline heavy formation where the composition included two shieldbearers and two spearmen in addition to a magus. One of the spearmen charged in to hold a choke point, but ended up locking themselves in a corner between a wall, a pile of rubble and the other frontline combatants. They were cut by a particularly mean-spirited foe and were in need of immediate healing. However, the mender was separated from the spearman by the pile of debris and the other combatants, and let others know they were not able to reach. However, the other frontline combatants were not able to address the need and the spearman fell.
The solution involves positioning the unit so that the mender's access is not blocked. Similarly, blocking a spearman's route to retreat leads to difficulties and should be avoided. An alternative solution would include the frontline fighters breaking away from fighting long enough to apply life-saving curatives on the wounded combatant.
A similar problem may arise even when maneuverability is not an issue. Sometimes the entire unit is beset by enemies on all fronts, and then auxiliary menders are required. It is best to abandon all notions of saving supplies when everyone's lives are collectively threatened. In this case, the solution involves making clear to both name the primary mender and to let others know their help will be needed situationally. Every member of the unit should have access to some potent curatives, vials of blurring and vials of invisibility for emergencies.
Infighting
While pleasantly uncommon, there have been groups torn apart by internal strife rather than the enemy's blows. The mild form of this problem includes mistrust and verbal barbs, whereas more serious problems involve paranoid ranting and even physical altercations between the unit's members. Even slight mistrust may hamper a group's efficacy, and full-blown armed conflict will surely be expensive on the field.
The solution involves maintaining a respectful and resilient attitude, and it is especially true in the face of adversity and failure. Additionally, one should take care to communicate before and during assignments as to avoid misunderstandings and hiring poor company. Even large disagreements that arise during the course of work should wait until it is safe to focus on debate.
References
[The list of references includes names of ringrunners and refugees, but some more recent names stand out]
Personal experience in the roles of shieldbearer, mender and magus.
Atif ibn Al'Qazar
Atreus Loukanis
Gustav Tattori
Kara Fields
Leiah Avryana
Snorri
Wanderer Lynneth
This last segment of the paper will examine previous failures and problems encountered during the course of mercenary work. The purpose is to outline a small number of failures clearly and concisely. Following the explanation of each failure, solutions are presented.
"I have worked with some people on jobs who just have a well trained and almost flawless understanding of where they need to be, when they should pull back to a more advantageous position with cover, et cetera.."
- Leiah Avryana, scholar
Exposed to archers
Many a time, the writer has been party to a group whose shieldbearer takes the fight to the enemy and disregards their often formidable backline of slingers or worse. In such situations, the entire unit is exposed to the assault from the front and also pelted by stones or arrows. In the worst case, the enemy missiles find purchase in the vulnerable backline who are unable to perform their role adequately or at all.
The solution involves using walls and natural formations in order to block enemy archers from firing at the unit. If enemy fire is inevitable, it is crucial to be ready to employ vials of blurring.
Ignoring choke points, caught in the open
A similar mistake in tactics involves the unit's inability to recognize potential choke points. Otherwise, the unit might recognize the ideal position but be unable to reach it in time before the enemy swarms the formation. The result has been either a drawn-out battle on many fronts or the quick slaughtering of the unit.
Solution involves noting defensive formations and choke points beforehand, and making sure to utilize them to the fullest in combat. Sometimes it is necessary to fall back to a defensible position and then the leader should be clear to call for an organized retreat.
Ineffective use of a choke point
Often small units hold choke points such as doors or narrow tunnels that are so small that two combatants struggle to stand beside one another. Therefore, it is often the case that only one or two combatants are swinging at the enemy while the rest of the frontline stands idly.
The solution involves arranging the frontline in a concave formation that lures the enemy past the choke point in hopes of breaching through. Instead, they are cut by the combined might of the entire frontline. In addition, versatile combatants often carry a bow or a similar option with which they may engage at range when the front is too crowded. Brief intermissions in battle are also suitable for the use of disruptive devices, especially if the group is exposed to enemy archers or slingers. Otherwise, bombs are a sound option.
Conflicting orders
Many problems arise from the unit having different tactical solutions to threats that arise in combat. For instance, one combatant might call for a retreat while another presses for a charge. When the unit splits its attention and potential between two maneuvers, even brilliant stratagems fall apart and the group is exposed to the enemy.
The solution involves choosing a leader whose word takes precedence during the engagement.
Unattended enemy magus
Left to their own devices, enemy magi will often rain destructive and debilitating invocations on the unit. Therefore, recognizing and neutralizing the threat is of primary concern. There have been many times when groups have been unable to properly address the threat, which leads to the enemy magus dispelling their wards or perhaps blasting the group on their knees with a powerful gust of wind before raining acid and fire on them.
The solution involves having access to vials of insulation and blurring, and agreeing the manner in which the enemy magus is to be dealt with. Usually the safest way is to use the terrain to the group's advantage, thereby forcing the mage out in the open where they may be singled out by the archer. If that is not possible, whittling down the enemy numbers from a safe position before risking a charge is the second safest option. Skilled groups with confidence in their survivability may even choose to charge magi outright, though such strategy is always best negotiated in advance.
Atreus Loukanis has a warning for armsmen:
"When holding the battle lines, consider what is the true threat to your company. A shaman invoking endless stream of conjurations will demand a break in formation, but too often I have seen men break line to chase a mere evoker slinging cantrips."
Blinded by avarice, slow to advance
The most frustrating way for a group to squander any profit that might be had is by busying themselves with looting and treasure when there is still fighting to be had. Wards fade, and it is best to press on while time is of the essence. Many a time has a group run out of protective magic simply because it has been too slow to advance, and often rampant looting is the cause.
The solution involves marking sites of potential finds and coming back to them once the enemy has been silenced. The rest is a balance of caution and steady advance. Some groups may prefer to save wards for later and in that situation early avarice and slow advance are not problems of similar magnitude.
"I had accompanied a band of sluggish shield bearers flanked by a pair of wizards. Their approach was slow and steady, lacking much brute force.. But so heavily enspelled that the foe could do little harm to them. Like dragging their feet through quicksand, slowly, slowly they battled until their magicks ran out. And suddenly, the foe became overbearing."
- Atreus Loukanis
Snorri further recommends that the person gathering the spoils should be skilled and known to be of sound moral character.
Split formation, force divided
The unit should always stick together unless splitting up is part of a maneuver upon which the group has agreed in advance. Sometimes a group neglects the importance of sticking together, and broken formations caused by poorly communicated charges and retreats expose the unit to undue danger.
"Sometimes there comes a time for a charge. It is important that all fall in step, a force split is beset on too many sides, and twice as weakened -- those behind may be slain or wounded, or worse."
- Gustav Tattori
The solution involves loud, clear and concise communication when it comes to orchestrating maneuvers. Tactics like charging enemy magi should be agreed upon before attempting to use them. When maneuvers are called for, the call ideally comes from the leader. It is crucial to maintain unit coherence unless tactics demand otherwise. Some situations such as hostile large scale evocations or the presence traps may require a split formation.
Death by a thousand cuts
Many a time has a group been besieged by seemingly nonthreatening foes like goblin runts and slinger, only to find that their combined blows wear down even a mighty warrior. Enemy missiles, even sling projectiles, may have a similar effect. The enemy may also employ offensive cantrips and first circle magic.
The solution involves employing vials of blur and being mindful of the group's positioning so that the group does not get swarmed.
Excessive reliance on the mender
One such situation involved a frontline heavy formation where the composition included two shieldbearers and two spearmen in addition to a magus. One of the spearmen charged in to hold a choke point, but ended up locking themselves in a corner between a wall, a pile of rubble and the other frontline combatants. They were cut by a particularly mean-spirited foe and were in need of immediate healing. However, the mender was separated from the spearman by the pile of debris and the other combatants, and let others know they were not able to reach. However, the other frontline combatants were not able to address the need and the spearman fell.
The solution involves positioning the unit so that the mender's access is not blocked. Similarly, blocking a spearman's route to retreat leads to difficulties and should be avoided. An alternative solution would include the frontline fighters breaking away from fighting long enough to apply life-saving curatives on the wounded combatant.
A similar problem may arise even when maneuverability is not an issue. Sometimes the entire unit is beset by enemies on all fronts, and then auxiliary menders are required. It is best to abandon all notions of saving supplies when everyone's lives are collectively threatened. In this case, the solution involves making clear to both name the primary mender and to let others know their help will be needed situationally. Every member of the unit should have access to some potent curatives, vials of blurring and vials of invisibility for emergencies.
Infighting
While pleasantly uncommon, there have been groups torn apart by internal strife rather than the enemy's blows. The mild form of this problem includes mistrust and verbal barbs, whereas more serious problems involve paranoid ranting and even physical altercations between the unit's members. Even slight mistrust may hamper a group's efficacy, and full-blown armed conflict will surely be expensive on the field.
The solution involves maintaining a respectful and resilient attitude, and it is especially true in the face of adversity and failure. Additionally, one should take care to communicate before and during assignments as to avoid misunderstandings and hiring poor company. Even large disagreements that arise during the course of work should wait until it is safe to focus on debate.
References
[The list of references includes names of ringrunners and refugees, but some more recent names stand out]
Personal experience in the roles of shieldbearer, mender and magus.
Atif ibn Al'Qazar
Atreus Loukanis
Gustav Tattori
Kara Fields
Leiah Avryana
Snorri
Wanderer Lynneth